Skip to main content

Cambodia's decision to walk backward by choosing coal-fired power plants

 

27 March 2020


 
 
28 March is the #EarthHour, #Voicefortheplanet and you just made a big decision to walk backward. Can you explain why you approved these power-plants, unanimously? How many trees will you approve to be planted to absorb the GHG you approved to emit? Will you?
 
The National Assembly and the Royal Government of Cambodia are failing Cambodia and the global environmental health, adaptation and sustainable future of our generation and our future generations. Can anyone from the national assembly explain why you approved these power plants? 
 
The NA’s unanimous approval on 26 March 2020 is permitting the construction of 2 coal-fired power plants worth $1.666 billion, after the Council of Ministers proposed in February 2020. The Royal Group will build a 700MW plant in Botum Sakor district of Koh Kong. Han Seng Coal Mine Co., Ltd. covers 265MW in Oddar Meanchey’s Trapaing Prasat district. The government claimed these plants will supply 500,000 or 7% of 3.8 million houses currently have no access to electricity.(https://www.phnompenhpost.com/.../national-assembly...)
 
It sounds good, but I wonder if the government and the NA have done some math? To fuel 1MW, it requires 9 tons of coal every day. Totally the two power plants will burn 7,785 tons per day. Of course, CO2 and other greenhouse gases will be polluting the surroundings and the planet. Is it not the most polluting option? Will those coal be imported from China? 
 
If invested in green energy such as solar power plant of 865MW, only $865 million is required over about 865ha of land. The construction could be way faster. Can anyone from the national assembly explain why you approved these power plants, unanimously? 
 
Globally, people are fighting for urgent obligation of richer countries to invest in adaptation measures. Experts claimed it requires of $1.8 trillion or more investment to improve adaption over the next decade; and the Cambodian NA and the Royal Government are approving a reverse direction. 
 
To the NA and the RGC, can you explain why you approved these power-plants, unanimously? How many trees will you approve to be planted to absorb the GHG you approved to emit? Will you? Don't say Cambodia, as one of the LDC, is not bonded by the carbon credit as an excuse to harm our generations.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HIV Epedamic in Battambang, Cambodia is a failure of the Government

This morning I heard again from a radio news that HIV infected population increases to 230 people in Roka Commune. Government and NCHADS still refused to inform their figure, reasoning that they are waiting for the confirmed test overseas. I am questioning that the HIV tests of more than 70,000 PLHIV since 1990's were not confirmed yet, as there blood sample was not sent overseas. MoH is telling that their testing capacity is not reliable. (?) Local Health Center Chief said he didn't know if it is his role to monitor and report the unlicensed doctor. OD director said he didn't know the unlicensed doctor, who was accused for HIV spreading through dirty syringes, who had run his clinic for more than a decade. I wonder who dare to take responsibility. MoH Minister, PHD director, OD director, commune chief, district governor, provincial governor, ... and who else you should blame? I claim for their responsibility, respectively. I blame government. I criticise NGO intervent...

Crusade against Shisha is replicating a lesson of failure

War against drug is wasting money:  War against drugs is already known an aggressive approach and a failure in many ways. First, it is too expensive. Secondly, when the drug dealers are cracked down, the organized smaller groups blossomed, and black market and distribution system created; therefore, they are even harder to be cracked down. Thirdly, if a dealer is arrested, the other dealers are still working and at most, they shift to a different location, village, district, or city. Fourthly, war against drugs give an opportunity to law enforcement officers or even group of officers to corrupt and stay behind the dealers. This approach will still require continual fights forever. On Tuesday 25, 2014, on the Annual Meeting of NACD, his excellence Meas Vyrith told Cambodia daily 1 that in about a month NACD and provincial/municipal authorities have cracked down 90 bars which supply Shisha. Like attacking drug dealers, in 2012, 1,788 people were arrested. In 2013, 1,830 were arr...

Corruption Created by Social Norm and Political Will

Corruption is the use of public or given power for private gain. There are many forms including bribery, fraud, extortion, influencing peddling, kickbacks, cronyism, patronage, embezzlement, vote buying, and election rigging. It is an automatic thinking of civil servants that corruption is acceptable and a norm.  Corruption caused by social norm: Cambodians, like many other high-context societies, believe that public officers will lose respect from others if they do not use their power to regard their relatives, friends or party. They will be treated as an outsider if they do not favour their superior and group. If they are given gift and they do not accept, they will be judged impolite and disrespect. Therefore, they perpetuate corruption automatically. Corruption caused by institutional culture: In many cases, getting a job in public sector is market – buying and selling jobs. People would like to get into this sector, which offers low salary package, because they could...